Pelotonics: Online Group Collaboration Made Easy

12 thoughts on “Pelotonics: Online Group Collaboration Made Easy”

1. The home page is very well done and includes all information an interested party would want to look at.  It is not confusing, it is user friendly and includes pertinent information on the first page.

   I checked all the tabs and everything was very clear and the information was very easy to understand.
   I viewed the tutorials and I would suggest that you make them larger, I found that I could not see all the information clearly – larger print and use more screen space would be my suggestion.

   You have exceptional contact information listed which leaves me confident that I will be able to contact someone immediately if need be.

   You have a very good resource in the FAQ area.  You have definitely make this section very easy to use and it appears that all areas a use may want to ask a question about are covered here.

   I visited Zoho Projects and the home page was not as attractive or interesting as yours, I preferred yours because it seemed easier to look at, Zoho’s colors were distracting.
   You have a video testimonial and are showing company logos that are using your project.  I would suggest you have actual references from these companies and perhaps have a picture included like Zoho does,it’s a good selling point to the viewer.

   Zoho has videos but they are not clear at all so I wouldn’t watch and listen. I did watch yours until the end but again, it would be better if we could see all the tabs, etc.

   I hope I have answered your questions adequately.
    
   Best Regards,
    
   Suzanne

2. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?

   Upon visiting you’re website I was pleasantly surprised to see how simple everything seemed, the purpose of the website was clearly outlined. The colors were attractive, the website looked professional and not flashy which is something I’ve always appreciated. I am speaking of the first half of the website, as in the first half of the page upon visiting. The second half felt completely disconnected from the organization of the first half, almost as if I was looking at two completely different sites. I thought it was a little crowded and although it complimented the site it served against it. As a site that is meant to feel like organization is made-easy I thought that this made it seem inadequate. 

   2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?

   I decided to look for a messaging service of sorts as I remember from my own experience with groups that live communication was an important tool to dribble ideas around, brain storm and such and I was able to find it easily. 

    3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?

   I believe that I was encouraged mainly by two things in your site, testimonials which work strongly towards making this site accessible to me and trustworthy. I also thought that having the “free trial” option was a great way to encourage new customers but as I browsed through you’re site I began to have problems with that. I felt bombarded with the ‘free trial’ button on every page, I think that once is enough after that you begin to seem like a pushy salesman which is always uncomfortable. 

    4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?

   I visited Basecamp and right from the get go you’re company seemed better as Basecamp had a tacky feel to it, almost as if the effort was not made but at least they had consistency and efficiency right. Basecamp was very basic but functional, I think that your site was going for basic but that first page, on the second half really made it seem like too much. The first half was a strong statement, the second was a pushy salesman. Still your site was preferable because of the others lack of creativity. 

    5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.

   I would probably loose the second half as it is not necessary, you have a testimonials tab, place all testimonials there. Having social links is always a plus so I would probably leave those there, and just as a personal preference I wouldn’t mind seeing a “live-chat” option just in case I had any questions. Overall I thought the website was superior to the second one I visited but loosing that crowded feel would make it perfect.  

3.  
   As I browsed the home page I first noticed that the page looked simple yet effective. I thought the purpose of the site was clearly given early with the information to the left of me. I thought the image to the right of me was helpful because it gave me a sample of what the Pelatonics program looked like. As I scrolled down I saw additional information which was organized but seemed inorganic. It did not flow with the page above and almost seemed like an add on.

   Creating an account with Pelatonics crossed my mind because it mentioned that I could try it free and I did not need to give my credit card information. The reasons given on the site as to why this would be a benefit was clearly defined immediately. Also, I enjoyed seeing a video about a customer’s story which helped in my decision making because this made the company more personable, caring and effective.

    I compared Pelatonics with another site found in the search engine. The other site was not visually appealing. The website was not organized compared to the Pelatonics website. Some of the postings on the competitor’s site was erratic and took away from its professionalism. I prefer the color scheme in Pelatonics site over the other site because the Pelatonics color was more colorful and appealing. The other site’s color was white and seemed very basic. The content on both pages was informative by giving reasons why their company was the best. The other site did have links to the social media links but I did not find this on the Pelatonics site. The competitor’s site also had live chat which would be useful but was not seen on the Pelatonics site.

   If I had to chose one site over the other I would choose Pelatonics over the other company for two reasons; one the Pelatonics website had an abundance of testimonials that I did not see on the other site at all. Secondly Pelatonics was more visually appealing then the other site which makes me think they take more pride in themselves as a company.

   I think that having the video testimonial on the first page is ok but the additional testimonials below the video might look better on the testimonial page.

    

4. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?
   My first impression is that this site is very professional and well organized. The main color is a very soothing shade of blue, which says: “Relax. Everything is going to be okay. We can help you handle your project.” And there are enough other colors to keep it interesting.
   The logo explains clearly what you do and the tag/slogan: “Simply get more done” will be read by many people: “Get more done, simply,” which again, is a big relief.
   The navigation bar is simple and clear.
   The video provides enough information with about 1/3 devoted to the problem and 2/3’s to the solution.
   The “Try It Free” button really stands out and so does the “no obligation, no credit card required” even though it is in small type. That is a welcome for a lot of us who are accustomed to all the get 30 days free offers that require but have to give a credit card.
   The headings/links just above the scroll lead to what are probably the biggest questions people will have other than “How Much,” which is in the navigation bar.
   The information below the scroll provides great supporting information. Beth’s video testimonial is excellent; she communicates extremely well. The other testimonials and lists of major corporations let’s people know that Pelotonics is for businesses small and super size. And there is are photos letting us know that it can also be used for personal and academic projects.
   2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?
   The number of years you have been in business and the effort you have taken to make this a user-friendly site is very evident. Everything is very clear. The links all work and take me right to the page.
   3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?
   Not at the moment and I definitely will keep it in mind for a specific organization I work with. We currently use Google Docs and I see you integrate it with Pelotonics. We have tried a couple of others briefly: DropBox and Sococo. However, for what we are doing now, Google Docs is working.
   4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?
   The site that I found is https://www.grouptable.com. It has an attractive home page. However, yours provides considerably more information. Or maybe I should say that I feel as though I have a better understanding of your site. GroupTable does have a video but it is on an internal page. It provides a fair number of details about how the site works. However, I prefer your overview and knowing from the navigation bar that there are tutorial videos that provide specifics when I’m ready to get down to work.
   As to pricing, GroupTable does not have a free service, however, its prices are considerably lower than yours. A person can pay $8/month or $35/year. There does not appear to be a limit on the number of projects/groups. However, from looking at the site, I think its target market is slightly different from yours. While yours includes personal and academic uses, your focus seems to be on business from start-up to Fortune 50. GroupTable seems to be open to everyone, but with more of an emphasis on personal, academic, and small business.
   5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.
   The one component that is missing from almost all collaboration sites, including yours, is the ability to have a live meetings. It would be extremely valuable to have audio and web conferencing on the same site as the documentsThe one site that I am certain has what they call real-time collaboration is Huddle. This is a site that integrates with LinkedIn. However, from your presentation, I would prefer your site to Huddle.
   The only other thing that has occurred to me is something that you probably you will not want to hear about: the name Pelotonics. It is not a name that is easy to remember. I only know that when and if there is a time for me to use the type of collaboration you provide, I am going to be saying: What’s the name of that site again?

5. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?
   I think the website looks very good. Everything looks in order and precise. I like the color schemes and initial video that shows some of the features of the site. It seems somewhat like a professional website.

   2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?
   I wanted to find videoconferencing or some type of chat feature but I did not find it. Also try to find the contact information, I found it top of the website but I didn’t see it in its usual spot on the bottom. Also did not see the contact times on the phone number. Nothing was confusing everything is self-explanatory and straightforward on the page.
    
   3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?
   I’m only slightly encouraged to create a new account. The try it free button on the front page brings out a weird ox that asks for your e-mail that looks very shady and somewhat unprofessional using boxes like that are reserved for unprofessional websites.
   4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?
    I looked on Google and found a similar webpage called group table. Their webpage is nice but it’s childish and too colorful, your webpage a lot more professional. I also enjoyed the page full of testimonials on yours. Also I prefer your page better because it has videos explaining what the website offers.
   5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.
    The page is very good although it suggests maybe cleaning up the testimonial page making it look more bold and more defined.

6. 1)      Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?
   Overall it looks like other web pages I have been at. It appears very conservative. It is well laid out, however, I think the font between your Title and the Try for Free button should be darker for easier reading for the older generation. I would also recommend dividing lines between the links at the top or underline them. The video was put together well. The last part at Sign up was a little to straight forward for my taste and pushed me away. I would recommend something like “If you want to see how easy it works sign up today” then end it the same way. I like your company name at the end it makes people remember the company name. The next row of links 3 of the 4 are good title people understand. Plan &Track appears to be missing something. There is room to add a little more descriptive. The text through the next section once again is too light for my old eyes and I would recommend darkening it some. I could not listen to the whole “A Customer Story” because it started to annoy me. I turned it off at 1:23. The problem was the music in the background was too much and was putting me to sleep. I would highly recommend you evaluate if you need this video here. I like the idea of the video but would either change the music, reduce the volume or find another video to replace it with. I also found that I glance over the Testimonials since it was below the video. Maybe move it below “Who Uses Pelotonics?” Overall rating is pretty good and very conservative. I am conservative and it appealed to me, not to flashy or pushy. If I was actually searching for a company to do this kind of work I would look further into your website. If you belong to the BBB you might want to include it.
   2)      Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?
   I search field would be useful for someone wanting to search your site. I looked at the competitor comparison. If I am shopping for this service I want to know how things stack up. I found it easily and found great value in the comparison. That alone would sway me to look further. Very well done!  Once again text is small and light in color. The older generation will not find this helpful. I really liked not having to hit back buttons from that page because the links at the left remained in place. The magnifying glass for the images on the messaging link was a nice feature as well. Usually it is another click, this is not the case here…..well done. The Global calendar image should be replaced with one that only has a few items so you can increase the size so people can read. There are so many tasks listed that it appears fuzzy. While a person can get the gist it just is not good enough for what you have done so far. The Project calendar is a much better example.
   3)      Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?
   If I was handling this kind of work I would definitely sign up due to the ease that you have made the information for making a decision. You pointed out who your competitors are and showed how you are better. The information on your web site is well laid out and would make me believe that you could handle the confusing tasks and timelines that my company may have.
   4)      Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which one do you prefer? Why?
   I did a Google search for “online group collaboration software” and the first hit was JiveOn.com. I went to their site and like the upfront approach that they used on their home page (Picture). The “Right in your face” approach that I would expect from a leading company. However after looking at the site I was annoyed with the links at the top that just took you down the page (I can do that with my scroll bar). Also their video immediately annoyed me because I work in an office environment and the way the people acted in the video would get them fired from where I work (I could not stomach the video). I think overall yours is well put together, however, I did see a lot of similarities between the two pages. I did not see Jive or Box, which rated higher on the Google then yours did, in your comparison (they also offered free trials). Having said that as a buyer I would return and purchase from your site but it would raise questions. You might want to put a blurb at the bottom that there are other companies but they did not merit consideration Such as (Jive, Box, etc.). Then if someone comes back they will see that you did mention them.
   5)      Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.
   You have way too many Try it Free buttons. Back it down to the home page and pricing page, maybe features. I would recommend removing it from testimonials and the Tutorial videos. If a person has looked that far odds are they will come back to the home page. The other option is leave it on home and tutorial videos and remove from the rest (first and last). One final option if you want to leave them on the other pages for convenience to the customer would be to change the color of the background of the button “try it free” to the same color of your text, thereby not so in your face but still handy for them.

7. 1. My first impression is that this is another one of those online work management apps. To be honest, I’ve seen a lot of these lately, so my first thought is: “Is Pelotonics offering anything new?” Other than that, 30 seconds on the home page has me thinking that it’s easy to understand, if a little crowded, especially at the bottom.
    
   2. I decided to just find out more about the features, especially in comparison to some of the work management software I’ve seen before. I clicked the “Features” tab and quickly discovered that you provide Google Docs and Evernote integration, neither of which I remembered seeing as part of similar software, so that’s one difference right there. The other features looked comparable to what I’ve seen before. So, yes, I found what I was looking for, and no, I wouldn’t say I was confused.
    
   3. Your prices look comparable to what I’ve seen for other apps like yours, so there’s a good chance I’d sign up if I had need of such a program.
    
   4. I’m sure I could find a dozen such companies. One I found quickly was Clarizen.

   In terms of services, Clarizen seems to be a lot more feature-rich than Pelotonics, including elements of accounting and tech support in addition to more extensive tools for project management, human resource management, and collaborative support. It’s priced per user instead of per project and doesn’t have a tiered pricing structure, which makes it hard to compare its value to the value of Pelotonics. However, Pelotonics does have a free plan and two very low-cost plans for low-use businesses, which Clarizen doesn’t have. (Clarizen would charge about $50 minimum for two users.) So for very small businesses that don’t need a lot of bells and whistles, Pelotonics would be the better choice.

   In terms of the web sites, it’s harder to choose a clear winner. I find Clarizen to have a better home page. Notice how, while designed similarly to yours, it’s shorter and more focused on selling points. On the other hand, I like your “Features” page better than their “Product” page. Your “Features” page has a very nice illustrative breakdown of features, and then when the user clicks on a feature, each individual page has attractive screenshots accompanied by compact copy. Clarizen makes the mistake of using very long pages that force the user to click on dozens of features individually to open up more pages. It’s tiresome. You both have clear, direct pricing and FAQ sections, and Pelotonics also has a substantial testimonial page. Clarizen has an additional page for the media and also sells some of its apps individually, but I’d say pages like that would be optional for you. As it is now, I think Pelotonics keeps the site a little simpler, and it works that way.
    
   5. I’m going to go through the main pages of your site and make some comments:
    
   Home Page – Rather generic but ok. The intro video is wonderful. It’s fast-paced, the animation is terrific, and the voiceover is great too. More importantly, it presents a good case for why a business would need Pelotonics. I notice your site doesn’t have a tag line, but there’s a possible one in this video: “Work better, faster, and happier.” I also like that you state right upfront that users can get a free trial without handing over credit card information. That’s a real draw. You might want to add that it’s a 30-day trial because that’s a significant period of time, not just a week or two, and may sway visitors in your favor. Scrolling down, I like that I can click on each selling point and move through a slideshow explaining the points more fully. Because of this, you really don’t need the additional features listed below. They should be saved for the “Features” page. Instead, I would replace them with the “Who Needs Pelotonics?” section. I’m not even sure it’s necessary, but if you really want to keep it, that’s where I’d put it. Then, since Pelotonics has some pretty big customers, I’d line up their logos along the bottom of the page. The rest of this stuff I’d get rid of. It’s not needed here. The testimonials and testimonial video should go on the “Testimonials” page. The “Find Yourself Struggling…” section isn’t necessary. 

   Features – This is very well done. I really like how the feature icons are arranged, and each individual page has some short, sweet copy and eye-catching screenshots. Looks good! This is also the first time I noticed your “Competitor Comparisons” section. I would move this to your “Pricing” page. That’s where it’s more relevant.

   Pricing – The pricing chart and FAQs are easy to understand. Pricing seems reasonable, although there’s quite a big price jump between the gold and platinum plans.

   Testimonials – Good idea to link each of these to a YouTube testimonial video! That’s something different! It’s always preferable to see a real person talking instead of just words on a page. 

   Contact Us – Yay! A physical address and phone number!

   Tutorial Videos – Didn’t watch these, but good to see you offer them.

   FAQs – Wow! This an extremely comprehensive alternative for people who prefer to learn the old-fashioned way rather than by video. I don’t think I would call this section “FAQs,” though, I’d merge this with the tutorial videos under one main page called “Tutorials” or “Help.” Then I’d subdivide that into one page of video tutorials and one page of traditional tutorials (what you currently have under “FAQs”).
    
   By and large, I think your site is well designed. You could make some improvements to the home page, but otherwise, it looks very good. I’m especially impressed with your use of video and visuals. Your product seems like a decent value for what it does. My concern is that there’s a glut of such products on the market. But it seems like you have some very big clients already, so if you’ve already established yourself, maybe your competitors are the ones who’ll be chasing you. Good luck!
    

8. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?
   There is a lot of information to take in with many of the key messages appearing below the fold requiring me to scroll down the page. Perhaps some of this information could appear further up the page instead of the revolving content at the top of the screen which I found distracting.
   
   2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?
   The top navigation menu was self explanatory which helped me to locate information about the features of your product. The items illustrated in the diagram of features are less in number than the left-hand menu features mentioned specifically. When I clicked on one of the features to see further detail I liked the page I was taken to as it had plenty of white space and enough information to tell me more about the specific feature. 
   3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?
   Possibly, although there are a large number of collaborative tools available on the market so it would take me somewhat longer to compare and contrast products to come to a decision.
   4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?
   I took a look at Thinkature.com which has a very uncluttered, attractive homepage as opposed to yours which includes a lot of information in the first instance with much of it below the fold. I prefer Pelotonics pale blue / white backgrounds with legible black text as opposed to Thinkature’s dark background and much lighter print. I also preferred the various different pages your site has including the tutorial video whereas Thinkature only shows pages of links without any additional information to guide and help the first time visitor. Although I don’t usually use a site search box I know others prefer such an approach so it may be worth considering incorporating one on your site ?
   5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.
   A couple of additional points I found the green ticks on the pricing chart very hard on my eyes. I checked out the tutorial video which is a really helpful feature. When I clicked on the full screen view of the YouTube video the detail on the screen became very blurred and hard to see. Also the voice narrating fades off a little around the 2:38 minute point.
   

9. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?
   Fairly well organized. I first looked for the “About” page, and found it in the footer. (consider moving this to header) Videos are a big plus and offer good insight into what is being offered. Did not find at all confusing… Everything is mapped out quite well. A good picture is painted of what the service is. No complaints.
    
   3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?
   Yes and mostly because it is free and simple. Looking at pricing model it is easy to understand what a subscriber will get for signing up. So no hesitation in that regard.
    
   4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?
   Through Bing I found “Group Table” which also looks to be a nice interface. I would rate this website and Group Table on equal footing. They seem to be equally well suited for the type of service offered.
    
   5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.
   Most bases covered here, would perhaps add a 800 number ate top right header to add to trust factor. Colors are good, Usability is good. Unless I missed it, I do not see social media connects? This should certainly be included. Site design is nice and web 2.0 looking. Overall good site, well planned and well implemented.

10. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?

    The first thing I noticed on the home page was the organizational simplicity of the page. The title is supported with an effective vision statement underneath which states the focus of the site. The free sign up could not be simpler and is placed well, right where the user will see it.
    The introductory video hits some key points which I think people can relate to, especially about the confusion that arises when to many things are floating around between to many people.

    Moving down, “Simply get more done” is repeated just below the “Simply get more done” a little above. It’s minor, but I would have put something else, linked to something else, and avoided the repetitive phrase. Clicking on it goes nowhere, as the link is the home page itself. So, I would think about that.

    The four major service areas are prominently displayed so there is no question in the users mind as to what services are offered.

    The “Who needs Pelotonics” shows the usefulness of the service in various areas and shows it is not limited in scope. The “Who uses Pelotonics” instills trust in users by seeing that major companies
    are using your services (Building trust on the internet is super important). This information is easily verifiable, so I think it adds to the credibility of the site, and will draw the right kind of attention to not only the home page, but your available services and menu options.

    The layout is clear and simple. menu options are self explanatory, the user does not even have to click on them to know what is within the site. The horizontal menu on top is uncluttered and direct. There are no useless space filling links. They all have a separate function, and I don’t think any more are needed. I guess what I am trying to say is the menu items there are whats needed to keep it simple for the user. Nothing extra.

    In summation, I would say the home page is simple, clear and well structured, but the second “Simply get more done” does not appear to have any real function and I would replace it with something else.

    2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?

    I found nothing confusing about the site. I looked for and found the pricing information and a lot of other information about general policy, which I found helpful. I always read FAQ’s, and they are right there, menu option in plain view and very extensive. However, in Contact Us, I did not see the name of a person or persons to speak with or contact. The names add a little friendliness to the Contact Us page.

    3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?

    Yes, due to the simplicity of the sign up process. Your not asking for a lot of personal information or someone’s life history! I really don’t like those type of sign ups.

    4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?

    I chose HyperOffice to compare. https://www.hyperoffice.com/

    I found similarities in the sites, but I noticed HyperOffice which has a few additional items that are helpful to the user such as a chat window and they offer webinars. I would still stick with Pelotonics as I doubt my needs would be so extensive as to require their services. Although I like the idea of attending a webinar and getting $100 off of a service, but their free sign up appears to be only for 30 days.

    5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have.

    Browser Compatibility: I tested the site in the 4 major browsers (Explorer, FireFox, Chrome and Safari) and found no issues.

    Navigation: The navigation is simple and clear and all the links worked when I tested them except the “Simply get more done” link which does not go anywhere. It appears to be just a home page link, but it works because it keeps you where you are.

    Layout and coloring: Layout is clear and simple as I have mentioned, pastel coloring is nice, although I prefer high contrast colors on my sites. Just a personal observation. Not sure if I would have the “A customer story” video placed where it is, it looks a little out of place.

    Thank you for reading my assessment of your site, I hope it has been helpful.

11. 1) Look around the home page – what is your initial impression of what you see?

    Upon looking at Pelotonics’ site intitially, I thought it looked very well put togther. I liked the webpage design and the intro video on the front page. It made things seem very simple to use.    

     
    2) Think of something you want to find on this website. Now try to find it. Did you find what you were looking for? Was anything confusing?

    Since I’m not very familiar with this business, my question was “what exactly do you do?” So I went to the Features tab which was right on the front page next to the home tab. Here they listed everything that a user could do and even gave steps on how to use the site properly.  It was very simple to navigate through.

       
    3) Are you encouraged to (create a new account, subscribe, sign up for a free trial, etc.)? Can you tell us why (or why not)?

    Not right now because I don’t have any projects coming up.   

      
    4) Go to search engine of your choice and find one other company that offers a similar service. Compare the two companies. Which on do you prefer? Why?

    I went to Zoho projects to compare the sites side by side and while Zoho is a good site to go to, Pelotronics has more to offer as far as features and is less costly (approx. 70% less) which is an important factor for any business.   

    5) Please share any additional feedback/comments you may have

    Overall, very nice looking site. You can tell the IT team put alot of effort into it. No typos and proper grammer (I’ve seen sites where they lacked in this area). I would definately keep this company in mind if any projects come up in the near future.   

12. The homepage of Pelotonics is very impressive and interactive.
     
    I was looking for a customer story and it was right as you begin to scroll down the page, very well placed. Very informative also.  Very easy to find.  Nothing was confusing.  The bold print font and video appeared clearly and quickly.  The video was also very positive about the experience from a customer standpoint. 
     
    I would be interested in signing up for a free trial to see how well the Pelotonics.com website helps with organization for business benefits.

    The site I found when searching was https://www.grouptable.com I feel as though your website is a lot more easy to understand and is a bit more impressive than their website.  https://www.grouptable.com seems to be geared towards anyone, while Pelotonics is geared towards business initially.

    I hope this feedback helps you grow in ways you are determined to!

     

Comments are closed.